Jangouts vs OpenVidu
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jangouts
Videoconferencing based on WebRTC and Janus Gateway with an UI
VS
OpenVidu
Self-hosted platform for real-time video applications
| Feature | Jangouts | OpenVidu |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 444 | ★ 2,123 |
| First released | 2025 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Google Hangouts, Skype | Twilio Video, Agora |
Why pick each one
Choose Jangouts if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose OpenVidu if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Jangouts or OpenVidu better?
Neither is universally better. OpenVidu has the larger community, while Jangouts is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jangouts and OpenVidu free and open-source?
Yes. Jangouts is licensed under MIT and OpenVidu under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jangouts and OpenVidu with Docker?
Jangouts: check the project docs for container support. OpenVidu: yes.