Jigasi vs Jangouts
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jigasi
SIP gateway and transcription bridge for Jitsi
VS
Jangouts
Videoconferencing based on WebRTC and Janus Gateway with an UI
| Feature | Jigasi | Jangouts |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 609 | ★ 444 |
| First released | 2015 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Zoom Phone | Google Hangouts, Skype |
Why pick each one
Choose Jigasi if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Jangouts if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Jigasi or Jangouts better?
Neither is universally better. Jigasi has the larger community, while Jangouts is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jigasi and Jangouts free and open-source?
Yes. Jigasi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jangouts under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jigasi and Jangouts with Docker?
Jigasi: yes. Jangouts: check the project docs for container support.