coturn vs OpenVidu
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
coturn
Open-source TURN and STUN server for WebRTC
VS
OpenVidu
Self-hosted platform for real-time video applications
| Feature | coturn | OpenVidu |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,274 | ★ 2,123 |
| First released | 2012 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | Twilio Video, Agora |
Why pick each one
Choose coturn if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.3k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Choose OpenVidu if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is coturn or OpenVidu better?
coturn is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenVidu if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are coturn and OpenVidu free and open-source?
Yes. coturn is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and OpenVidu under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run coturn and OpenVidu with Docker?
coturn: yes. OpenVidu: yes.