Jami Server Bridge vs Jami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jami Server Bridge
Self-hosted name registry and bridge for the Jami network
VS
Jami
Fully distributed, peer-to-peer encrypted communication
| Feature | Jami Server Bridge | Jami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 400 | ★ 41 |
| First released | 2017 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Skype, Zoom | Skype, Zoom, WhatsApp |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Jami Server Bridge or Jami better?
Neither is universally better. Jami Server Bridge has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Jami Server Bridge and Jami free and open-source?
Yes. Jami Server Bridge is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Jami under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jami Server Bridge and Jami with Docker?
Jami Server Bridge: yes. Jami: check the project docs for container support.