Berty vs Jami Server Bridge

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyJami Server Bridge
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 9,268★ 400
First released20182017
ReplacesWhatsApp, SignalSkype, Zoom

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Choose Jami Server Bridge if…

  • Fully decentralized calling
  • Strong privacy
Jami Server Bridge details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or Jami Server Bridge better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while Jami Server Bridge is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Berty and Jami Server Bridge free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jami Server Bridge under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and Jami Server Bridge with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. Jami Server Bridge: yes.

Related comparisons