iSpy vs Kerberos Agent
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
iSpy
Open-source camera security and surveillance software
VS
Kerberos Agent
Lightweight video surveillance agent for a single camera
| Feature | iSpy | Kerberos Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C# | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,611 | ★ 1,088 |
| First released | 2007 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Blue Iris | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose Kerberos Agent if…
- Lightweight per-camera model
- Scales with orchestration
Frequently asked questions
Is iSpy or Kerberos Agent better?
Neither is universally better. iSpy has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are iSpy and Kerberos Agent free and open-source?
Yes. iSpy is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Kerberos Agent under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run iSpy and Kerberos Agent with Docker?
iSpy: check the project docs for container support. Kerberos Agent: yes.
Related comparisons
- iSpy vs Agent DVR
- iSpy vs WebRTC Camera
- Kerberos Agent vs WebRTC Camera
- iSpy vs Cameradar
- Kerberos Agent vs Cameradar
- iSpy vs CompreFace
- Kerberos Agent vs CompreFace
- iSpy vs Double Take
- Kerberos Agent vs Double Take
- iSpy vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
- Kerberos Agent vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration