WebRTC Camera vs iSpy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WebRTC Camera
Low-latency camera streaming integration for Home Assistant
VS
iSpy
Open-source camera security and surveillance software
| Feature | WebRTC Camera | iSpy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,161 | ★ 1,611 |
| First released | 2021 | 2007 |
| Replaces | Cloud camera streaming | Blue Iris |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is WebRTC Camera or iSpy better?
Neither is universally better. WebRTC Camera has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are WebRTC Camera and iSpy free and open-source?
Yes. WebRTC Camera is licensed under MIT and iSpy under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WebRTC Camera and iSpy with Docker?
WebRTC Camera: check the project docs for container support. iSpy: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- WebRTC Camera vs Cameradar
- iSpy vs Cameradar
- WebRTC Camera vs CompreFace
- iSpy vs CompreFace
- WebRTC Camera vs Double Take
- iSpy vs Double Take
- WebRTC Camera vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
- iSpy vs Frigate Home Assistant Integration
- WebRTC Camera vs Frigate Mobile Companion
- iSpy vs Frigate Mobile Companion