Ipsilon vs node-oidc-provider
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ipsilon
Identity provider for federated single sign-on
VS
node-oidc-provider
Certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 provider for Node.js
| Feature | Ipsilon | node-oidc-provider |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | source, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 80 | ★ 3,788 |
| First released | 2014 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Okta, PingFederate | Auth0, Okta |
Why pick each one
Choose node-oidc-provider if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Ipsilon or node-oidc-provider better?
Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Ipsilon and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?
Yes. Ipsilon is licensed under GPL-3.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ipsilon and node-oidc-provider with Docker?
Ipsilon: check the project docs for container support. node-oidc-provider: yes.