Inngest vs StackStorm
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Inngest
Event-driven workflow and background job platform
VS
StackStorm
Event-driven automation, often called IFTTT for ops
| Feature | Inngest | StackStorm |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,701 | ★ 6,515 |
| First released | 2021 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Zapier, AWS Step Functions | Zapier, AWS Systems Manager |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Inngest or StackStorm better?
Neither is universally better. StackStorm has the larger community, while Inngest is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Inngest and StackStorm free and open-source?
Yes. Inngest is licensed under Apache-2.0 and StackStorm under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Inngest and StackStorm with Docker?
Inngest: yes. StackStorm: yes.