Activepieces vs Inngest
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Activepieces | Inngest |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 97 · Excellent | 90 · Excellent |
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 24,701 | ★ 5,879 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Zapier, Make | Zapier, AWS Step Functions |
What are Activepieces and Inngest?
Activepieces
Activepieces is an open-source, no-code automation tool for building workflows that connect business apps. It targets teams wanting an open Zapier alternative with an accessible UI. It is deployed via Docker.
- No-code flow builder
- Growing library of pieces
- AI-assisted automation
- MIT-licensed core
Inngest
Inngest is an open-source platform for building event-driven workflows and reliable background jobs. It provides durable step functions, automatic retries and a local development server, and the execution engine can be self-hosted.
- Event-driven background jobs
- Durable step functions
- Local development server
- Self-hostable execution engine
Activepieces vs Inngest: key differences
Activepieces is written in TypeScript, while Inngest is built with Go. Licensing differs — MIT for Activepieces versus Apache-2.0 for Inngest. Activepieces has the considerably larger community, at 24,701 GitHub stars versus 5,879.
Why pick each one
Choose Activepieces if…
- Truly open-source license
- Friendly no-code UI
- Active development
Watch out for
- Fewer integrations than n8n
- Younger project
Choose Inngest if…
- Good developer experience
- Reliable step execution
Watch out for
- Some features tied to Inngest Cloud
Frequently asked questions
Is Activepieces or Inngest better?
Neither is universally better. Activepieces has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Activepieces and Inngest free and open-source?
Yes. Activepieces is licensed under MIT and Inngest under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Activepieces and Inngest with Docker?
Activepieces: yes. Inngest: yes.