Icinga 2 vs OpenNMS Horizon

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureIcinga 2OpenNMS Horizon
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score86 · Excellent83 · Excellent
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Java
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM512 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,239★ 1,173
First released20142000
ReplacesSolarWinds, PRTGSolarWinds, PRTG

What are Icinga 2 and OpenNMS Horizon?

Icinga 2

Icinga 2 is a modern monitoring system that checks the availability of network resources and notifies users of outages. It is Nagios-compatible, scales across clusters, and pairs with Icinga Web for a polished interface.

  • Distributed cluster monitoring
  • REST API for automation
  • Nagios plugin compatibility
  • Modern Icinga Web UI

Read the full Icinga 2 guide →

OpenNMS Horizon

OpenNMS Horizon is an enterprise-grade network monitoring and management platform that handles fault, performance, and traffic monitoring at scale. It supports SNMP, flow analysis, and event correlation.

  • Fault and performance monitoring
  • Flow analysis
  • Event correlation
  • Scales to large networks

Icinga 2 vs OpenNMS Horizon: key differences

Icinga 2 is written in C++, while OpenNMS Horizon is built with Java. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for Icinga 2 versus AGPL-3.0 for OpenNMS Horizon. Icinga 2 is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 4,096 MB for OpenNMS Horizon. OpenNMS Horizon is the more established project (first released 2000), while Icinga 2 arrived in 2014.

Why pick each one

Choose Icinga 2 if…

  • Scales to large environments
  • Active development and community

Watch out for

  • Steep initial setup
  • Multiple components to manage
Icinga 2 details

Choose OpenNMS Horizon if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
OpenNMS Horizon details

Frequently asked questions

Is Icinga 2 or OpenNMS Horizon better?

Neither is universally better. Icinga 2 has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Icinga 2 and OpenNMS Horizon free and open-source?

Yes. Icinga 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0 and OpenNMS Horizon under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Icinga 2 and OpenNMS Horizon with Docker?

Icinga 2: yes. OpenNMS Horizon: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Icinga 2 or OpenNMS Horizon?

Icinga 2 has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 4,096 MB for OpenNMS Horizon. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons