Icinga Web 2 vs Netdata

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureIcinga Web 2Netdata
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 839★ 80,075
First released20142013
ReplacesNagios XI, op5 MonitorDatadog, New Relic

Why pick each one

Choose Icinga Web 2 if…

  • Fast and lightweight UI
  • Strong module ecosystem
Icinga Web 2 details

Choose Netdata if…

  • Instant insight out of the box
  • Beautiful real-time charts
  • Easy install
Netdata details

Frequently asked questions

Is Icinga Web 2 or Netdata better?

Netdata is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Icinga Web 2 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Icinga Web 2 and Netdata free and open-source?

Yes. Icinga Web 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Netdata under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Icinga Web 2 and Netdata with Docker?

Icinga Web 2: yes. Netdata: yes.

Related comparisons