HyperDX vs Apache SkyWalking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHyperDXApache SkyWalking
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 9,808★ 24,915
First released20232015
ReplacesDatadog, SentryNew Relic, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose HyperDX if…

  • Session replay correlation
  • Developer-focused UX
HyperDX details

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Frequently asked questions

Is HyperDX or Apache SkyWalking better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while HyperDX is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are HyperDX and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?

Yes. HyperDX is licensed under MIT and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run HyperDX and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?

HyperDX: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.

Related comparisons