HyperDX vs Pushgateway
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
HyperDX
Open-source observability for logs, traces, and session replay
VS
Pushgateway
Push acceptor for ephemeral and batch job metrics
| Feature | HyperDX | Pushgateway |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 93 · Excellent | 87 · Excellent |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,912 | ★ 3,369 |
| First released | 2023 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Datadog, Sentry | Datadog |
What are HyperDX and Pushgateway?
HyperDX
HyperDX is an open-source observability platform that correlates logs, metrics, traces, and session replays in one place. Built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse, it helps developers debug production issues quickly.
- Correlated logs, traces, and replays
- OpenTelemetry-native
- ClickHouse storage
- Full-text log search
Pushgateway
The Prometheus Pushgateway allows ephemeral and batch jobs to expose their metrics to Prometheus. Jobs push metrics to the gateway, which Prometheus then scrapes on its regular schedule.
- Accepts pushed metrics
- Bridges batch jobs to Prometheus
- Persists metrics to disk
- Tiny footprint
HyperDX vs Pushgateway: key differences
HyperDX is written in TypeScript, while Pushgateway is built with Go. Licensing differs — MIT for HyperDX versus Apache-2.0 for Pushgateway. Pushgateway is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for HyperDX. Pushgateway is the more established project (first released 2015), while HyperDX arrived in 2023. HyperDX has the considerably larger community, at 9,912 GitHub stars versus 3,369.
Why pick each one
Choose HyperDX if…
- Session replay correlation
- Developer-focused UX
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Requires ClickHouse
Choose Pushgateway if…
- Solves batch job monitoring
- Simple to run
Watch out for
- Not for high-frequency metrics
- Can become a single point of failure
Frequently asked questions
Is HyperDX or Pushgateway better?
Neither is universally better. HyperDX has the larger community, while Pushgateway is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are HyperDX and Pushgateway free and open-source?
Yes. HyperDX is licensed under MIT and Pushgateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HyperDX and Pushgateway with Docker?
HyperDX: yes. Pushgateway: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, HyperDX or Pushgateway?
Pushgateway has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for HyperDX. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.