HyperDX vs Hertzbeat
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
HyperDX
Open-source observability for logs, traces, and session replay
VS
Hertzbeat
Real-time monitoring system with customizable templates
| Feature | HyperDX | Hertzbeat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,808 | ★ 7,351 |
| First released | 2023 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Datadog, Sentry | Zabbix, Datadog |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is HyperDX or Hertzbeat better?
Neither is universally better. HyperDX has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are HyperDX and Hertzbeat free and open-source?
Yes. HyperDX is licensed under MIT and Hertzbeat under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HyperDX and Hertzbeat with Docker?
HyperDX: yes. Hertzbeat: yes.