HyperDX vs Pulse Monitor
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
HyperDX
Open-source observability for logs, traces, and session replay
VS
Pulse Monitor
Self-hosted monitoring of Proxmox and infrastructure
| Feature | HyperDX | Pulse Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 93 · Excellent | 91 · Excellent |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,912 | ★ 6,742 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Datadog, Sentry | Datadog |
What are HyperDX and Pulse Monitor?
HyperDX
HyperDX is an open-source observability platform that correlates logs, metrics, traces, and session replays in one place. Built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse, it helps developers debug production issues quickly.
- Correlated logs, traces, and replays
- OpenTelemetry-native
- ClickHouse storage
- Full-text log search
Pulse Monitor
Pulse is a self-hosted monitoring application focused on Proxmox VE and PBS environments, surfacing node, VM, and backup health. It provides real-time dashboards and alerting.
- Proxmox monitoring
- VM and node health
- Backup status
- Real-time dashboards
HyperDX vs Pulse Monitor: key differences
HyperDX is written in TypeScript, while Pulse Monitor is built with Go. Pulse Monitor is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for HyperDX.
Why pick each one
Choose HyperDX if…
- Session replay correlation
- Developer-focused UX
Watch out for
- Newer project
- Requires ClickHouse
Choose Pulse Monitor if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.7k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is HyperDX or Pulse Monitor better?
Neither is universally better. HyperDX has the larger community, while Pulse Monitor is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are HyperDX and Pulse Monitor free and open-source?
Yes. HyperDX is licensed under MIT and Pulse Monitor under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HyperDX and Pulse Monitor with Docker?
HyperDX: yes. Pulse Monitor: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, HyperDX or Pulse Monitor?
Pulse Monitor has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for HyperDX. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.