HyperDX vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHyperDXGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 9,808★ 28,687
First released20232018
ReplacesDatadog, SentrySplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose HyperDX if…

  • Session replay correlation
  • Developer-focused UX
HyperDX details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is HyperDX or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are HyperDX and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. HyperDX is licensed under MIT and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run HyperDX and Grafana Loki with Docker?

HyperDX: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons