SHSelfHostIndex

Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup vs ZFS Autobackup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup Open-source backup solution for files and databases VS ZF ZFS Autobackup Automated ZFS snapshot and replication tool
FeatureBackblaze alt nono Nxs-backupZFS Autobackup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 275★ 794
First released20222012
ReplacesVeeamVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup details

Choose ZFS Autobackup if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
ZFS Autobackup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup or ZFS Autobackup better?

Neither is universally better. ZFS Autobackup has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup and ZFS Autobackup free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ZFS Autobackup under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup and ZFS Autobackup with Docker?

Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup: yes. ZFS Autobackup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons