Amanda vs ZFS Autobackup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Amanda
Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver
VS
ZFS Autobackup
Automated ZFS snapshot and replication tool
| Feature | Amanda | ZFS Autobackup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 267 | ★ 794 |
| First released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Veeam, CommVault | Veeam |
Why pick each one
Choose Amanda if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Written in C
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose ZFS Autobackup if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Amanda or ZFS Autobackup better?
ZFS Autobackup is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Amanda if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Amanda and ZFS Autobackup free and open-source?
Yes. Amanda is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and ZFS Autobackup under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Amanda and ZFS Autobackup with Docker?
Amanda: check the project docs for container support. ZFS Autobackup: check the project docs for container support.