SHSelfHostIndex

Backrest vs Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backrest Web UI and orchestrator for Restic backups VS BA Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup Open-source backup solution for files and databases
FeatureBackrestBackblaze alt nono Nxs-backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 275
First released20242022
ReplacesBackblazeVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup better?

Backrest is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Backrest and Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup with Docker?

Backrest: yes. Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup: yes.

Related comparisons