Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup vs Restic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackblaze alt nono Nxs-backupRestic
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 275★ 35,412
First released20222015
ReplacesVeeamBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup details

Choose Restic if…

  • Strong encryption
  • Efficient deduplication
  • Wide backend support
Restic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup or Restic better?

Neither is universally better. Restic has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup and Restic free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Restic under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup and Restic with Docker?

Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup: yes. Restic: yes.

Related comparisons