HomeGallery vs Photofield

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHomeGalleryPhotofield
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score72 · Good79 · Good
CategoryPhoto ManagementPhoto Management
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,185★ 608
First released20202022
ReplacesGoogle PhotosGoogle Photos

What are HomeGallery and Photofield?

HomeGallery

HomeGallery is a self-hosted web gallery that indexes photos and videos and offers fast browsing, similarity search, and face detection. It builds an offline-capable database from your existing media folders.

  • Similarity search
  • Face detection
  • Video support
  • Offline-capable database

Read the full HomeGallery guide →

Photofield

Photofield is an experimental, fast photo viewer designed to browse very large photo collections smoothly. It uses a tile-based layout to render hundreds of thousands of images without slowing down.

  • Handles huge libraries
  • Smooth tile-based viewing
  • Fast indexing
  • Low resource use

HomeGallery vs Photofield: key differences

HomeGallery is written in JavaScript, while Photofield is built with Go. Photofield is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for HomeGallery. HomeGallery is the more established project (first released 2020), while Photofield arrived in 2022.

Why pick each one

Choose HomeGallery if…

  • Fast browsing
  • Reads existing folders

Watch out for

  • Indexing can be slow
  • No upload from app
HomeGallery details

Choose Photofield if…

  • Excellent performance
  • Simple deployment

Watch out for

  • Viewer only, no editing
  • Experimental status
Photofield details

Frequently asked questions

Is HomeGallery or Photofield better?

Neither is universally better. HomeGallery has the larger community, while Photofield is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are HomeGallery and Photofield free and open-source?

Yes. HomeGallery is licensed under MIT and Photofield under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run HomeGallery and Photofield with Docker?

HomeGallery: yes. Photofield: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, HomeGallery or Photofield?

Photofield has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for HomeGallery. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons