HASS.Agent vs ThingsBoard

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHASS.AgentThingsBoard
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageC#Java
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,281★ 22,200
First released20212017
ReplacesIFTTTAWS IoT, Azure IoT

Why pick each one

Choose HASS.Agent if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C#
HASS.Agent details

Choose ThingsBoard if…

  • Powerful IoT platform
  • Highly customizable dashboards
ThingsBoard details

Frequently asked questions

Is HASS.Agent or ThingsBoard better?

Neither is universally better. ThingsBoard has the larger community, while HASS.Agent is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are HASS.Agent and ThingsBoard free and open-source?

Yes. HASS.Agent is licensed under MIT and ThingsBoard under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run HASS.Agent and ThingsBoard with Docker?

HASS.Agent: check the project docs for container support. ThingsBoard: yes.

Related comparisons