Beehive vs HASS.Agent
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Beehive
Event and agent system for connecting things
VS
HASS.Agent
Windows companion for Home Assistant control
| Feature | Beehive | HASS.Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Home Automation |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,485 | ★ 1,281 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | IFTTT | IFTTT |
Why pick each one
Choose HASS.Agent if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in C#
Frequently asked questions
Is Beehive or HASS.Agent better?
Neither is universally better. Beehive has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Beehive and HASS.Agent free and open-source?
Yes. Beehive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and HASS.Agent under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Beehive and HASS.Agent with Docker?
Beehive: yes. HASS.Agent: check the project docs for container support.