EMQX vs HASS.Agent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEMQXHASS.Agent
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageErlangC#
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 16,599★ 1,281
First released20262021
ReplacesIFTTT

Why pick each one

Choose EMQX if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Erlang
EMQX details

Choose HASS.Agent if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C#
HASS.Agent details

Frequently asked questions

Is EMQX or HASS.Agent better?

Neither is universally better. EMQX has the larger community, while HASS.Agent is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are EMQX and HASS.Agent free and open-source?

Yes. EMQX is licensed under Apache-2.0 and HASS.Agent under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run EMQX and HASS.Agent with Docker?

EMQX: yes. HASS.Agent: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons