HASS.Agent vs Goeland
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
HASS.Agent
Windows companion for Home Assistant control
VS
Goeland
Feed aggregator that forwards items to email and webhooks
| Feature | HASS.Agent | Goeland |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C# | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,281 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | IFTTT | Feedly, IFTTT |
Why pick each one
Choose HASS.Agent if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in C#
Choose Goeland if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is HASS.Agent or Goeland better?
HASS.Agent is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Goeland if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are HASS.Agent and Goeland free and open-source?
Yes. HASS.Agent is licensed under MIT and Goeland under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HASS.Agent and Goeland with Docker?
HASS.Agent: check the project docs for container support. Goeland: yes.