HASS.Agent vs Homebridge
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
HASS.Agent
Windows companion for Home Assistant control
VS
Homebridge
Bring non-HomeKit smart devices into Apple Home
| Feature | HASS.Agent | Homebridge |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C# | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,281 | ★ 25,444 |
| First released | 2021 | 2014 |
| Replaces | IFTTT | Apple HomeKit hubs |
Why pick each one
Choose HASS.Agent if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in C#
Frequently asked questions
Is HASS.Agent or Homebridge better?
Neither is universally better. Homebridge has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are HASS.Agent and Homebridge free and open-source?
Yes. HASS.Agent is licensed under MIT and Homebridge under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HASS.Agent and Homebridge with Docker?
HASS.Agent: check the project docs for container support. Homebridge: yes.