Holesail Switchboard vs NPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Holesail Switchboard
Manage multiple holesail P2P tunnels from a single dashboard
VS
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
| Feature | Holesail Switchboard | NPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | free | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1 | ★ 34,157 |
| First released | 2022 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose Holesail Switchboard if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Written in HTML
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Holesail Switchboard or NPS better?
Neither is universally better. NPS has the larger community, while Holesail Switchboard is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Holesail Switchboard and NPS free and open-source?
Yes. Holesail Switchboard is licensed under free and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Holesail Switchboard and NPS with Docker?
Holesail Switchboard: yes. NPS: yes.