hitobito vs OpnForm
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
hitobito
Manage complex group hierarchies with members, events and a lot more
VS
OpnForm
Beautiful open-source form builder
| Feature | hitobito | OpnForm |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 475 | ★ 3,545 |
| First released | 2026 | 2026 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose hitobito if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose OpnForm if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is hitobito or OpnForm better?
Neither is universally better. OpnForm has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are hitobito and OpnForm free and open-source?
Yes. hitobito is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpnForm under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run hitobito and OpnForm with Docker?
hitobito: check the project docs for container support. OpnForm: yes.