OpenCalendar Sync vs hitobito
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenCalendar Sync
Self-hosted shared calendar with public event pages
VS
hitobito
Manage complex group hierarchies with members, events and a lot more
| Feature | OpenCalendar Sync | hitobito |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 852 | ★ 475 |
| First released | 2014 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Calendly, Google Calendar | — |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenCalendar Sync if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose hitobito if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCalendar Sync or hitobito better?
Neither is universally better. OpenCalendar Sync has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are OpenCalendar Sync and hitobito free and open-source?
Yes. OpenCalendar Sync is licensed under MIT and hitobito under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenCalendar Sync and hitobito with Docker?
OpenCalendar Sync: yes. hitobito: check the project docs for container support.