calcurse vs hitobito
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
calcurse
Text-based calendar and scheduling application
VS
hitobito
Manage complex group hierarchies with members, events and a lot more
| Feature | calcurse | hitobito |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 16 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,301 | ★ 475 |
| First released | 2004 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Calendar | — |
Why pick each one
Choose calcurse if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Choose hitobito if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is calcurse or hitobito better?
calcurse is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider hitobito if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are calcurse and hitobito free and open-source?
Yes. calcurse is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and hitobito under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run calcurse and hitobito with Docker?
calcurse: check the project docs for container support. hitobito: check the project docs for container support.