OpenCalendar Sync vs OpnForm

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenCalendar SyncOpnForm
CategoryCalendar & ContactsCalendar & Contacts
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 852★ 3,545
First released20142026
ReplacesCalendly, Google Calendar

Why pick each one

Choose OpenCalendar Sync if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
OpenCalendar Sync details

Choose OpnForm if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
OpnForm details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCalendar Sync or OpnForm better?

Neither is universally better. OpnForm has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are OpenCalendar Sync and OpnForm free and open-source?

Yes. OpenCalendar Sync is licensed under MIT and OpnForm under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenCalendar Sync and OpnForm with Docker?

OpenCalendar Sync: yes. OpnForm: yes.

Related comparisons