Haunt vs Orchid
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Haunt
Programmable static site and blog generator in Scheme
VS
Orchid
Static site generator for documentation and blogs on the JVM
| Feature | Haunt | Orchid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Scheme | Kotlin |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 400 | ★ 529 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Jekyll | Jekyll, GitBook |
Why pick each one
Choose Haunt if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in Scheme
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Orchid if…
- Released under the LGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Kotlin
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Haunt or Orchid better?
Neither is universally better. Orchid has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Haunt and Orchid free and open-source?
Yes. Haunt is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Orchid under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Haunt and Orchid with Docker?
Haunt: check the project docs for container support. Orchid: check the project docs for container support.