Cobalt vs Orchid
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cobalt
Static site generator written in Rust
VS
Orchid
Static site generator for documentation and blogs on the JVM
| Feature | Cobalt | Orchid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Kotlin |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,535 | ★ 529 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Jekyll, Hugo | Jekyll, GitBook |
Why pick each one
Choose Cobalt if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
Choose Orchid if…
- Released under the LGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Kotlin
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Cobalt or Orchid better?
Cobalt is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Orchid if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cobalt and Orchid free and open-source?
Yes. Cobalt is licensed under MIT and Orchid under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cobalt and Orchid with Docker?
Cobalt: check the project docs for container support. Orchid: check the project docs for container support.