Monika vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMonikaGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 625★ 28,687
First released20212018
ReplacesPingdom, Datadog SyntheticsSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Monika if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Monika details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Monika or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Monika is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Monika and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Monika is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Monika and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Monika: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons