Hanko vs Ory Oathkeeper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hanko
Passkey-first authentication for modern applications
VS
Ory Oathkeeper
Identity and access proxy for zero-trust networks
| Feature | Hanko | Ory Oathkeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,002 | ★ 3,590 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Clerk | Cloudflare Access |
Why pick each one
Choose Hanko if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Ory Oathkeeper if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Hanko or Ory Oathkeeper better?
Neither is universally better. Hanko has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Hanko and Ory Oathkeeper free and open-source?
Yes. Hanko is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Ory Oathkeeper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hanko and Ory Oathkeeper with Docker?
Hanko: yes. Ory Oathkeeper: yes.