2FAuth vs Hanko
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
2FAuth
Self-hosted web app to manage two-factor authentication codes
VS
Hanko
Passkey-first authentication for modern applications
| Feature | 2FAuth | Hanko |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,090 | ★ 9,002 |
| First released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Authy, Google Authenticator | Auth0, Clerk |
Why pick each one
Choose 2FAuth if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
Choose Hanko if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is 2FAuth or Hanko better?
Neither is universally better. Hanko has the larger community, while 2FAuth is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are 2FAuth and Hanko free and open-source?
Yes. 2FAuth is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Hanko under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 2FAuth and Hanko with Docker?
2FAuth: yes. Hanko: yes.