Boundary vs Hanko
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Boundary
Identity-based secure access to systems and services
VS
Hanko
Passkey-first authentication for modern applications
| Feature | Boundary | Hanko |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | BUSL-1.1 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,055 | ★ 9,002 |
| First released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Teleport, StrongDM | Auth0, Clerk |
Why pick each one
Choose Boundary if…
- Released under the BUSL-1.1 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Hanko if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Boundary or Hanko better?
Neither is universally better. Hanko has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Boundary and Hanko free and open-source?
Yes. Boundary is licensed under BUSL-1.1 and Hanko under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Boundary and Hanko with Docker?
Boundary: yes. Hanko: yes.