h5ai vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureh5aiSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 6,052★ 33,952
First released20122015
ReplacesGoogle DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose h5ai if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
h5ai details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is h5ai or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while h5ai is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are h5ai and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. h5ai is licensed under MIT and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run h5ai and SeaweedFS with Docker?

h5ai: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons