h5ai vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureh5aiPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 6,052★ 43,003
First released20122026
ReplacesGoogle Drive

Why pick each one

Choose h5ai if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
h5ai details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is h5ai or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while h5ai is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are h5ai and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. h5ai is licensed under MIT and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run h5ai and Puter with Docker?

h5ai: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons