gTunnel vs localtunnel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gTunnel
Robust TCP tunneling solution over gRPC
VS
localtunnel
Expose your localhost to the world for testing
| Feature | gTunnel | localtunnel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 273 | ★ 22,440 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | ngrok | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose gTunnel if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose localtunnel if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is gTunnel or localtunnel better?
localtunnel is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider gTunnel if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are gTunnel and localtunnel free and open-source?
Yes. gTunnel is licensed under GPL-3.0 and localtunnel under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gTunnel and localtunnel with Docker?
gTunnel: yes. localtunnel: yes.