gtimelog vs Virtual TimeClock
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gtimelog
Minimalist time logging desktop application
VS
Virtual TimeClock
Powerful, easy-to-use time tracking software
| Feature | gtimelog | Virtual TimeClock |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-2.0 | ⊘ Proprietary |
| Language | Python | Unknown |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 276 | — |
| First released | 2008 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Toggl | — |
Why pick each one
Choose gtimelog if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Virtual TimeClock if…
- Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
- Written in Unknown
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is gtimelog or Virtual TimeClock better?
gtimelog is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Virtual TimeClock if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are gtimelog and Virtual TimeClock free and open-source?
Yes. gtimelog is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Virtual TimeClock under ⊘ Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gtimelog and Virtual TimeClock with Docker?
gtimelog: check the project docs for container support. Virtual TimeClock: check the project docs for container support.