EGroupware vs Tine
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted groupware options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
EGroupware
Web-based groupware and team collaboration suite
VS
Tine
Professional open-source groupware and CRM
| Feature | EGroupware | Tine |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Groupware | Groupware |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 295 | ★ 21 |
| First released | 2003 | 2007 |
| Replaces | Microsoft 365, Google Workspace | Microsoft 365, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose Tine if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in HTML
Frequently asked questions
Is EGroupware or Tine better?
Neither is universally better. EGroupware has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are EGroupware and Tine free and open-source?
Yes. EGroupware is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Tine under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EGroupware and Tine with Docker?
EGroupware: yes. Tine: yes.