Grafana k6 vs Pushgateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Pushgateway
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 3,356
First released20172015
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Pushgateway if…

  • Solves batch job monitoring
  • Simple to run
Pushgateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Pushgateway better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community, while Pushgateway is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Grafana k6 and Pushgateway free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pushgateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Pushgateway with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Pushgateway: yes.

Related comparisons