Grafana k6 vs Kibana

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Kibana
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 21,230
First released20172013
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterSplunk, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Kibana if…

  • Rich visualization options
  • Mature ecosystem
Kibana details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Kibana better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana k6 and Kibana free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Kibana under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Kibana with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Kibana: yes.

Related comparisons