Grafana Alloy vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana AlloyUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 3,417★ 89,960
First released20242021
ReplacesDatadog AgentPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Alloy if…

  • One agent for all signals
  • Strong Grafana integration
Grafana Alloy details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Alloy or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Grafana Alloy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grafana Alloy and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Alloy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Alloy and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Grafana Alloy: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons