GoSuki vs omnom
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoSuki
Privacy-first bookmark manager unifying all browsers
VS
omnom
Bookmarking with full-page snapshot archiving
| Feature | GoSuki | omnom |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 536 | ★ 653 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Raindrop.io, Pinboard | Pocket, Raindrop.io |
Why pick each one
Choose GoSuki if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose omnom if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is GoSuki or omnom better?
Neither is universally better. omnom has the larger community, while GoSuki is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GoSuki and omnom free and open-source?
Yes. GoSuki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and omnom under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoSuki and omnom with Docker?
GoSuki: check the project docs for container support. omnom: yes.