GoAccess vs Phlare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoAccess
Real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
VS
Phlare
Self-hosted status page and incident communication tool
| Feature | GoAccess | Phlare |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | C | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,762 | ★ 15,183 |
| First released | 2010 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Statuspage, Better Uptime |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GoAccess or Phlare better?
GoAccess is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Phlare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are GoAccess and Phlare free and open-source?
Yes. GoAccess is licensed under MIT and Phlare under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoAccess and Phlare with Docker?
GoAccess: yes. Phlare: yes.