GoAccess vs Jaeger
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoAccess
Real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
VS
Jaeger
End-to-end distributed tracing for microservices
| Feature | GoAccess | Jaeger |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,762 | ★ 23,082 |
| First released | 2010 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Datadog APM, New Relic |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GoAccess or Jaeger better?
Neither is universally better. Jaeger has the larger community, while GoAccess is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GoAccess and Jaeger free and open-source?
Yes. GoAccess is licensed under MIT and Jaeger under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoAccess and Jaeger with Docker?
GoAccess: yes. Jaeger: yes.