Dozzle vs Jaeger
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dozzle
Real-time log viewer for Docker containers
VS
Jaeger
End-to-end distributed tracing for microservices
| Feature | Dozzle | Jaeger |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,984 | ★ 23,082 |
| First released | 2018 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Datadog Logs | Datadog APM, New Relic |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dozzle or Jaeger better?
Neither is universally better. Jaeger has the larger community, while Dozzle is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dozzle and Jaeger free and open-source?
Yes. Dozzle is licensed under MIT and Jaeger under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dozzle and Jaeger with Docker?
Dozzle: yes. Jaeger: yes.